When budget times are tough, should we expand programming to include new people? Should we create new programs to help new people? Or should we fund programs that exist that are getting severely cut?
What do you think?
When budget times are tough, should we expand programming to include new people? Should we create new programs to help new people? Or should we fund programs that exist that are getting severely cut?
What do you think?
Where would you look? Contracts? Field offices? Mental Health Institutes? Resource Centers? Other?
It is a large bill covering a lot of topics. What do you think?
The first part of the plan is to go from 8 service areas to 5. Could this be a way to make DHS more efficient?
Did you know there are over 25 different types of audits that any human service providers can undergo in the state? Several of them are from Medicaid on different issues at different times. Is there a way to make this process more efficient?
This week I have had many meetings with providers. One request is to add topics to my discussion board about inefficiencies in system processes.
One of these inefficiencies came from 7 words being added to the state code. From those words, multiple employees have to work many hours to track trips to and from work for their consumers. It seems simple, but the waste involved in such a simple request is amazing. And, better yet, it is not a federal requirement.
Issues like these are exactly what I would like us to discuss here. I look forward to your suggestions.
I had two comments on accreditation for state schools and community colleges.
Is there a way to simplify the process?
The biggest complaint I get from persons working with children and families is the amount of paperwork. As a therapist, I was paid for the time I was with clients and not for when I was working on paperwork.
Options for reducing paperwork?